<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Link-O-Rama</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aarongleeman.com/2010/07/09/link-o-rama-10/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aarongleeman.com/2010/07/09/link-o-rama-10/</link>
	<description>Baseball news, insight and analysis from Aaron Gleeman</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 17:12:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: BD57</title>
		<link>http://aarongleeman.com/2010/07/09/link-o-rama-10/comment-page-1/#comment-1397</link>
		<dc:creator>BD57</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 02:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aarongleeman.com/?p=15126#comment-1397</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[it&#039;s one thing to say &quot;we&#039;re not playing aggressive, etc.&quot;

It&#039;s another thing entirely when you&#039;re saying &quot;THEY&#039;RE not giving a full effort, like I am.&quot;

Hunter almost always does the latter.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s one thing to say &#8220;we&#8217;re not playing aggressive, etc.&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s another thing entirely when you&#8217;re saying &#8220;THEY&#8217;RE not giving a full effort, like I am.&#8221;</p>
<p>Hunter almost always does the latter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sara b</title>
		<link>http://aarongleeman.com/2010/07/09/link-o-rama-10/comment-page-1/#comment-1395</link>
		<dc:creator>sara b</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2010 04:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aarongleeman.com/?p=15126#comment-1395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[love the music..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>love the music..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karl</title>
		<link>http://aarongleeman.com/2010/07/09/link-o-rama-10/comment-page-1/#comment-1390</link>
		<dc:creator>Karl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 22:35:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aarongleeman.com/?p=15126#comment-1390</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ted: I agree and I don&#039;t even think it&#039;s close.

While it was enjoyable to read all of the Twins trade fantasies and other fans reactions to those &quot;rumored deals&quot; when the chips were down - whatever package we could have offered - even our &quot;#1&quot; prospect and another of our &quot;top 5&quot; doesn&#039;t hold a candle to the three Rangers prospects and a major league ready switch hitting power first baseman.  

Let me say that again: Major League Ready Switch Hitting Power First Baseman.  How many of those are ever available as part of a trade?  

Now there is no guarantee that Smoak becomes the next Eddie Murray or even the next Mark Grace or even the next Doug Mientkewicz.  What is clear is that the Rangers package as of July 09, 2010 was far superior in value than any rumored Twins package.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ted: I agree and I don&#8217;t even think it&#8217;s close.</p>
<p>While it was enjoyable to read all of the Twins trade fantasies and other fans reactions to those &#8220;rumored deals&#8221; when the chips were down &#8211; whatever package we could have offered &#8211; even our &#8220;#1&#8243; prospect and another of our &#8220;top 5&#8243; doesn&#8217;t hold a candle to the three Rangers prospects and a major league ready switch hitting power first baseman.  </p>
<p>Let me say that again: Major League Ready Switch Hitting Power First Baseman.  How many of those are ever available as part of a trade?  </p>
<p>Now there is no guarantee that Smoak becomes the next Eddie Murray or even the next Mark Grace or even the next Doug Mientkewicz.  What is clear is that the Rangers package as of July 09, 2010 was far superior in value than any rumored Twins package.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted</title>
		<link>http://aarongleeman.com/2010/07/09/link-o-rama-10/comment-page-1/#comment-1388</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 21:50:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aarongleeman.com/?p=15126#comment-1388</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Karl:  The latter.  

Lee to the Rangers makes me less sick to my stomach.  But now I fear that the Yanks get a win-win-win:  They are still favorites to win the AL, or if not, still among the favorites; they now keep a top prospect; and they might still sign Lee in the off season.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Karl:  The latter.  </p>
<p>Lee to the Rangers makes me less sick to my stomach.  But now I fear that the Yanks get a win-win-win:  They are still favorites to win the AL, or if not, still among the favorites; they now keep a top prospect; and they might still sign Lee in the off season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karl</title>
		<link>http://aarongleeman.com/2010/07/09/link-o-rama-10/comment-page-1/#comment-1387</link>
		<dc:creator>Karl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 21:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aarongleeman.com/?p=15126#comment-1387</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ESPN reporting Cliff Lee to the Rangers.

Here is the question I am interested to hear from all you about:

In a vaccuum - ignoring the fact that Ramos is blocked by Mauer and Morneau would block Smoak.  Woul you rather have Aaron Hicks and Wilson Ramos or Justin Smoak, Blake Beavan, Josh Lueke and Matthew Lawson?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ESPN reporting Cliff Lee to the Rangers.</p>
<p>Here is the question I am interested to hear from all you about:</p>
<p>In a vaccuum &#8211; ignoring the fact that Ramos is blocked by Mauer and Morneau would block Smoak.  Woul you rather have Aaron Hicks and Wilson Ramos or Justin Smoak, Blake Beavan, Josh Lueke and Matthew Lawson?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walter Solbchek</title>
		<link>http://aarongleeman.com/2010/07/09/link-o-rama-10/comment-page-1/#comment-1386</link>
		<dc:creator>Walter Solbchek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 21:31:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aarongleeman.com/?p=15126#comment-1386</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Take back the Prince crack.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Take back the Prince crack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted</title>
		<link>http://aarongleeman.com/2010/07/09/link-o-rama-10/comment-page-1/#comment-1384</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 15:51:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aarongleeman.com/?p=15126#comment-1384</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Looks like the Yanks will win out and get Lee.  Plus, chances are they re-sign him in the offseason, right?  

This makes me a bit sick to my stomach.  

Also, it makes the Santana trade look even worse, as the Yanks seem willing to trade for Lee as though he is a rental (even though they could likely re-sign him), yet are still giving up more than Smith got from the Mets.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like the Yanks will win out and get Lee.  Plus, chances are they re-sign him in the offseason, right?  </p>
<p>This makes me a bit sick to my stomach.  </p>
<p>Also, it makes the Santana trade look even worse, as the Yanks seem willing to trade for Lee as though he is a rental (even though they could likely re-sign him), yet are still giving up more than Smith got from the Mets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://aarongleeman.com/2010/07/09/link-o-rama-10/comment-page-1/#comment-1383</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 15:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aarongleeman.com/?p=15126#comment-1383</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[*could use]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*could use</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://aarongleeman.com/2010/07/09/link-o-rama-10/comment-page-1/#comment-1382</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 15:20:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aarongleeman.com/?p=15126#comment-1382</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That might be throwing guys under the bus, but I don&#039;t know that it&#039;s always a bad thing.  If your offense comes out and appears to mail it in, someone should call them on it.  All the more effective coming from one of your premier players.  Sure seems like the Twins could someone like Hunter right about now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That might be throwing guys under the bus, but I don&#8217;t know that it&#8217;s always a bad thing.  If your offense comes out and appears to mail it in, someone should call them on it.  All the more effective coming from one of your premier players.  Sure seems like the Twins could someone like Hunter right about now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jesse</title>
		<link>http://aarongleeman.com/2010/07/09/link-o-rama-10/comment-page-1/#comment-1381</link>
		<dc:creator>jesse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 13:07:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aarongleeman.com/?p=15126#comment-1381</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[JENNA FISCHER IS 35???]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JENNA FISCHER IS 35???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
