<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Gleeman and The Geek&#8221; #18: Winter Meetings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aarongleeman.com/2011/12/07/podcast-gleeman-and-the-geek-episode-18/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aarongleeman.com/2011/12/07/podcast-gleeman-and-the-geek-episode-18/</link>
	<description>Baseball news, insight and analysis from Aaron Gleeman</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 19:17:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://aarongleeman.com/2011/12/07/podcast-gleeman-and-the-geek-episode-18/comment-page-1/#comment-9052</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 19:03:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aarongleeman.com/?p=64689#comment-9052</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;I&#039;m not opposed to the idea of Matt Capps in a vacuum.&quot; ~Aaron

I bet John would love seeing Matt Capps in a vacuum, too.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I&#8217;m not opposed to the idea of Matt Capps in a vacuum.&#8221; ~Aaron</p>
<p>I bet John would love seeing Matt Capps in a vacuum, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry Doyle</title>
		<link>http://aarongleeman.com/2011/12/07/podcast-gleeman-and-the-geek-episode-18/comment-page-1/#comment-9048</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry Doyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 15:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aarongleeman.com/?p=64689#comment-9048</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your buerle.
About me : http://chicago.whitesox.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20111027&amp;content_id=25805648&amp;vkey=news_cws&amp;c_id=cws]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your buerle.<br />
About me : <a href="http://chicago.whitesox.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20111027&#038;content_id=25805648&#038;vkey=news_cws&#038;c_id=cws" rel="nofollow">http://chicago.whitesox.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20111027&#038;content_id=25805648&#038;vkey=news_cws&#038;c_id=cws</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane</title>
		<link>http://aarongleeman.com/2011/12/07/podcast-gleeman-and-the-geek-episode-18/comment-page-1/#comment-9041</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 05:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aarongleeman.com/?p=64689#comment-9041</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I will be interested to see what you guys think (IF Cuddyer is signed by the Twins for 3 years) will happen to the likes of Joe Benson, Rene Tosoni, Ben Revere, Evan Bigley, etc. Signing Cuddyer to a 3-year deal is stupid, but if they do it, maybe these prospects play for trade value this year to enable some sort of move to improve the Twins starting pitching (Benson in particular).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will be interested to see what you guys think (IF Cuddyer is signed by the Twins for 3 years) will happen to the likes of Joe Benson, Rene Tosoni, Ben Revere, Evan Bigley, etc. Signing Cuddyer to a 3-year deal is stupid, but if they do it, maybe these prospects play for trade value this year to enable some sort of move to improve the Twins starting pitching (Benson in particular).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted</title>
		<link>http://aarongleeman.com/2011/12/07/podcast-gleeman-and-the-geek-episode-18/comment-page-1/#comment-9040</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 02:25:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aarongleeman.com/?p=64689#comment-9040</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How about Beltran as a Cuddyer replacement?  Just read that the Giants will no re sign him and that the market for his services appears thin.  He might be at the point in his career where a one year deal for $8 million would be attractive.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about Beltran as a Cuddyer replacement?  Just read that the Giants will no re sign him and that the market for his services appears thin.  He might be at the point in his career where a one year deal for $8 million would be attractive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff O</title>
		<link>http://aarongleeman.com/2011/12/07/podcast-gleeman-and-the-geek-episode-18/comment-page-1/#comment-9039</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff O</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 01:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aarongleeman.com/?p=64689#comment-9039</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@jama I have my doubts Cuddyer could repeat the season he just had.  And he&#039;ll be another year older by the time free agency rolls around next year.  No chance he accepts arbitration.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@jama I have my doubts Cuddyer could repeat the season he just had.  And he&#8217;ll be another year older by the time free agency rolls around next year.  No chance he accepts arbitration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://aarongleeman.com/2011/12/07/podcast-gleeman-and-the-geek-episode-18/comment-page-1/#comment-9035</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 23:21:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aarongleeman.com/?p=64689#comment-9035</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why does John think 3 years 25M a good deal for Cuddyer if Willingham is more or less equivalent, more or less the same price, and we don&#039;t lose the picks?  For a team that didn&#039;t suck salty donkey nuts last year and doesn&#039;t have a pessimistic future, maybe I&#039;d sacrifice the picks for the &quot;clubhouse guy&quot; all the fans like, but right now losing those picks doesn&#039;t look too good...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why does John think 3 years 25M a good deal for Cuddyer if Willingham is more or less equivalent, more or less the same price, and we don&#8217;t lose the picks?  For a team that didn&#8217;t suck salty donkey nuts last year and doesn&#8217;t have a pessimistic future, maybe I&#8217;d sacrifice the picks for the &#8220;clubhouse guy&#8221; all the fans like, but right now losing those picks doesn&#8217;t look too good&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jama</title>
		<link>http://aarongleeman.com/2011/12/07/podcast-gleeman-and-the-geek-episode-18/comment-page-1/#comment-9034</link>
		<dc:creator>jama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 23:16:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aarongleeman.com/?p=64689#comment-9034</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If all Cuddyer is getting offered is a 3 year $24 million deal is there a chance he just accepts arbitration and takes the $12-$13 million he&#039;d likely get for one year and go from there?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If all Cuddyer is getting offered is a 3 year $24 million deal is there a chance he just accepts arbitration and takes the $12-$13 million he&#8217;d likely get for one year and go from there?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff O</title>
		<link>http://aarongleeman.com/2011/12/07/podcast-gleeman-and-the-geek-episode-18/comment-page-1/#comment-9030</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff O</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 18:17:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aarongleeman.com/?p=64689#comment-9030</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since when did you adopt a Boston accent??  Great podcast though!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since when did you adopt a Boston accent??  Great podcast though!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doofus</title>
		<link>http://aarongleeman.com/2011/12/07/podcast-gleeman-and-the-geek-episode-18/comment-page-1/#comment-9028</link>
		<dc:creator>doofus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 18:04:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aarongleeman.com/?p=64689#comment-9028</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t think Slowey was a jerk personally.  Just a jerk about his situation.  He paid the consequences for it and all have moved on, case closed.

In reference to you podcast last night regarding the Murphy inquiry.  I am wondering if the Twins might look to trade a CF if the have a back up CF.  of note the Astros are willing to pay 1/2 of Myers salary for a prospect.  That&#039;s a 200 inning pitcher for 5 million with an option for 10 million if he&#039;s any good.  Myers for Revere as Houston has traded their speedy CF last year we could even through in Butera to even it out....That&#039;s a deal waiting to happen.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think Slowey was a jerk personally.  Just a jerk about his situation.  He paid the consequences for it and all have moved on, case closed.</p>
<p>In reference to you podcast last night regarding the Murphy inquiry.  I am wondering if the Twins might look to trade a CF if the have a back up CF.  of note the Astros are willing to pay 1/2 of Myers salary for a prospect.  That&#8217;s a 200 inning pitcher for 5 million with an option for 10 million if he&#8217;s any good.  Myers for Revere as Houston has traded their speedy CF last year we could even through in Butera to even it out&#8230;.That&#8217;s a deal waiting to happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curt</title>
		<link>http://aarongleeman.com/2011/12/07/podcast-gleeman-and-the-geek-episode-18/comment-page-1/#comment-9027</link>
		<dc:creator>Curt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 16:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aarongleeman.com/?p=64689#comment-9027</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Agree with Aaron on Slowey-bashing. Tactics the same with, among others, Blyleven and Carew in the 70&#039;s. Media parrots team-party-line and gullible fans eat it up. Not saying Slowey is Gandhi... I&#039;ll bet 23 of 25 guys on any team are jerks... but he is just one of 23 jerks. Once the media starts bad-mouthing him he becomes a bigger jerk (to them). Go figure.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree with Aaron on Slowey-bashing. Tactics the same with, among others, Blyleven and Carew in the 70&#8242;s. Media parrots team-party-line and gullible fans eat it up. Not saying Slowey is Gandhi&#8230; I&#8217;ll bet 23 of 25 guys on any team are jerks&#8230; but he is just one of 23 jerks. Once the media starts bad-mouthing him he becomes a bigger jerk (to them). Go figure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
