April 8, 2015

Ervin Santana suspended 80 games, Twins turn back to Mike Pelfrey

Ervin Santana Twins

Well, at least Mike Pelfrey is happy again.

This offseason the Twins signed Ervin Santana to a four-year, $55 million deal that stands as the largest free agent contract in team history and now, before he could even throw a pitch in a game that counts, he's been suspended for half the season. Santana tested positive for a substance on MLB's banned performance-enhancing drug list called Stanozolol, which he claimed in a statement entered his system without his knowledge:

I am frustrated that I can't pinpoint how the substance in question entered my body. What I can guarantee is I never knowingly took anything illegal to enhance my performance. That's just not me, never has been and never will.

I serve as a role model for many kids in my home country who dream of playing at the highest level. I would never put baseball, my family, or my country in a position where its integrity is jeopardized. I preach hard work and don't believe in short cuts. Moving forward, I need to be more careful on what I consume in my home country. I will be more vigilant of medications I take so that I don't commit another mistake.

Whatever. I'm not someone who cares about the moral implications of performance enhancement, so Santana using the common excuse of not knowing how a banned substance got into his body just means he's claiming ignorance and bad luck rather than malice. He either took a banned substance in an effort to improve his performance and got caught or took a banned substance unintentionally with no ties to performance and got caught. Either way he's suspended until July.

Santana's suspension is without pay and the Twins will receive a $6.7 million refund on his $13.5 million salary for this season. Instead of owing him $55 million for four years they owe him $48.3 million for three-and-a-half years, which is arguably an even worse deal because teams typically are willing to overpay free agents at the end of their contracts in order to get strong performances at the beginning. Oh, and the Twins still forfeit a second-round draft pick for signing Santana.

Rather than use Santana's suspension as an opportunity for the rotation to get younger the Twins stuck with their frustrating spring training approach of giving every open roster spot to the older, more expensive, lower-upside option. Pelfrey, who lost the fifth-starter battle to Tommy Milone and supposedly also finished behind Trevor May, moves back into the rotation after voicing his displeasure with a bullpen role. May remains at Triple-A, with Alex Meyer.

There's a tendency to overstate the impact of a suspension like Santana's for the same reason many people have a hard time wrapping their heads around the notion that MVP-caliber players are worth "only" six or eight wins above a replacement-level player. However, if you dig into the numbers even a little bit it's pretty clear that being without Santana for three months isn't going to wreck the team unless the team was already a wreck.

Santana is 33 years old and has a 4.17 career ERA, including 3.95 last season (in the NL) and 4.06 from 2012-2014. Most projections for 2015 pegged Santana between 4.00 and 4.75. Even assuming he'd have stayed healthy and thrown 90-100 innings during the 80-game suspension the difference between Santana with, say, a 4.25 ERA and his replacements with, say, a 5.50 ERA is 10-15 runs. Typically every 10 runs is worth about one win.

Or instead think of it this way: Last season the Twins went 70-92 (.432), including 50-80 (.385) in games not started by Phil Hughes. Based on that to go .500 in Santana's starts would seemingly be a positive outcome. That means 8-8 during an 80-game suspension. If his replacements are two full games worse the team would be 6-10 (.375) in those same starts. To be four full games worse would mean a 4-12 (.250) record, which is really, really bad. Even for Pelfrey.

Anything can happen, of course, but that "anything" also means the replacements could perform better than Santana. Whether in terms of runs allowed or in terms of the team's record in his starts, it seems realistic to say Santana's suspension is most likely to cost one or two wins. That certainly hurts, but for the Twins the embarrassment and frustration probably hurts more than the actual lost games and they're choosing to inflict even more pain by turning back to Pelfrey.

For a lengthy discussion about the Santana suspension, plus the Twins' rotation plans in the short and long term, check out this week's "Gleeman and The Geek" episode.


  1. How long until someone claims this as their “original” thought on a Twins blog elsewhere???

    Comment by kelsmu03 — April 7, 2015 @ 11:04 pm

  2. I’d really like to just have this team get back to where I can cheer for them without being embarrassed by it. Is that too much to ask? It’s been a long time since 2010.

    Comment by John Madsen — April 7, 2015 @ 11:07 pm

  3. I have been saying this for years now. The Twins have not committed to rebuilding and that makes the 90+ loss seasons even harder to take. Their approach to managing their prospects essentially delays the needed rebuilding all the longer.

    Byron Buxton is 21.110 years old. Mike Trout is 23.243 year old. The difference is that Mike Trout has 2200 MAJOR league plate appearances to Buxton’s zero. While maybe Buxton isn’t going to be as good as Trout, the major difference in the development of the two players is that the Angels were a much more competitive team yet they found a way to get their young prospect into the lineup anyways.

    The Twins have absolutely NOTHING to play for. This is almost certainly going to be another 90 loss season, plus or minus a couple. Yet we send our best players down to the minors and play mediocre, almost replacement level “veteran” players that makes the losses worthless.

    Comment by mlhouse — April 7, 2015 @ 11:38 pm

  4. I would think what happened to Hicks would give pause to people who want to rush our top prospects to the show.

    Comment by RegularJoe62 — April 8, 2015 @ 2:17 am

  5. Or perhaps Hicks just isn’t very good. Just because he failed after being brought up early doesn’t justify leaving others down as a result. Danny Santana and Kennys Vargas were also brought up early and they both seem to doing just fine.

    Comment by Eric — April 8, 2015 @ 9:46 am

  6. Let’s take a moment to think about what happened to Hicks. Before his gig in center field to start the 2013 season, he had had four or five years of seasoning in the minors. Regardless of the fact that he jumped from Double A to the Majors (and skipped AAA), aren’t four or five years enough? Let’s stop blaming the Twins for “pushing” him too early.

    Comment by jfs — April 9, 2015 @ 12:35 pm

  7. I think if Buxton hadn’t been injured last year, played a full season and had made normal progression, he’d be the starting CF right now. The Twins, for all their faults, haven’t been shy about rushing position players to the big leagues. Pitchers on the other hand……

    Comment by Hope4Change — April 8, 2015 @ 6:35 am

  8. In my mind, the issue wasn’t so much in losing Ervin Santana as it was the timing of it all. Here the Twins made a couple of moves in the off-season to really address their biggest weakness, there is some optimism about the prospects in the farm system and things, organizationally, were looking up, at least a little bit. Then comes this news, a day before the start of the season and it just felt like all of the air left the balloon. I have to imagine from a clubhouse morale standpoint that this was a pretty big deal too, even if it is only Ervin Santana.

    Comment by coguar99 — April 8, 2015 @ 2:51 pm

  9. Great 1-2 punch the Twins have. Even with last year’s craptastic bunch, they didn’t have a run differential of -15 until May 25th.

    Comment by alexlegge — April 8, 2015 @ 6:58 pm

  10. I thought this happened days ago?

    Comment by eric — April 8, 2015 @ 7:35 pm

  11. Is he no longer the largest free agent contract?

    Comment by Joel Thingvall — April 8, 2015 @ 9:56 pm

Leave a comment